{"id":4901,"date":"2024-06-27T17:40:41","date_gmt":"2024-06-27T21:40:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/"},"modified":"2025-09-19T18:07:50","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T22:07:50","slug":"fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Coment\u00e1rios sobre a decis\u00e3o da Suprema Corte dos EUA nos casos da Lei de Tratamento M\u00e9dico de Emerg\u00eancia e Trabalho (Moyle v. Estados Unidos, Idaho v. Estados Unidos)"},"template":"","class_list":["post-4901","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","article_type-news","article_format-news","article_format-statements","issue_tax-legal-abortion","issue_legacy-abortion","location-united-states"],"acf":{"details":{"":null,"article_type":26,"article_format":44,"authors":"","add_button":false,"button_type":"link","button":"","download":"","download_button_text":"","featured_image":3288},"sidebar":{"issues":{"title":"Quest\u00f5es priorit\u00e1rias","issues":[34]},"locations":{"title":"Localiza\u00e7\u00e3o","locations":[147]},"partners":{"title":"Parceiros","partners":""}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_hero_article","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_hero_article":{"":null,"anchor_id":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">NOVA YORK, NY <\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">- A Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos\u2019 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/06\/27\/us\/politics\/supreme-court-idaho-abortion.html?\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">decis\u00e3o de hoje de arquivar os dois casos consolidados<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> A decis\u00e3o da Suprema Corte de Idaho, centrada na Lei Federal de Tratamento M\u00e9dico de Emerg\u00eancia e Trabalho (EMTALA), significa que, por enquanto, os hospitais de Idaho devem oferecer atendimento ao aborto quando for medicamente necess\u00e1rio em uma situa\u00e7\u00e3o de emerg\u00eancia, mesmo em estados que tenham proibi\u00e7\u00f5es ou restri\u00e7\u00f5es ao aborto que n\u00e3o prevejam uma exce\u00e7\u00e3o para proteger a sa\u00fade da paciente. A Suprema Corte restabeleceu uma decis\u00e3o de um tribunal inferior que permitia que as salas de emerg\u00eancia dos hospitais de Idaho realizassem abortos de emerg\u00eancia para salvar a vida e a sa\u00fade de uma pessoa gr\u00e1vida. A EMTALA exige que os hospitais que recebem fundos federais (que s\u00e3o quase todos os hospitais nos EUA) forne\u00e7am \u201ctratamento estabilizador necess\u00e1rio\u201d em uma emerg\u00eancia.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">No entanto, embora seja uma boa not\u00edcia o fato de que as pacientes agora devem receber legalmente o atendimento de estabiliza\u00e7\u00e3o de que precisam quando precisam em Idaho, com esses casos a Suprema Corte teve a oportunidade de afirmar claramente os direitos de todas as gestantes ao atendimento de emerg\u00eancia, mas n\u00e3o o fez.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">Como <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/23pdf\/23-726_6jgm.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">O juiz Ketanji Brown Jackson escreveu,<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> a decis\u00e3o \u201cn\u00e3o \u00e9 uma vit\u00f3ria para as pacientes gr\u00e1vidas de Idaho\u201d, mas sim \u201cum atraso. Enquanto este tribunal se atrasa e o pa\u00eds espera, as gr\u00e1vidas que sofrem de condi\u00e7\u00f5es m\u00e9dicas de emerg\u00eancia permanecem em uma posi\u00e7\u00e3o prec\u00e1ria, pois seus m\u00e9dicos n\u00e3o sabem o que a lei exige\u201d.\u201d<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">A decis\u00e3o de hoje \u00e9 mais um lembrete do ambiente incrivelmente hostil de sa\u00fade sexual e reprodutiva, direitos e justi\u00e7a (SRHRJ) em que os americanos t\u00eam vivido desde <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgmedia\/dobbs-decision\/\"><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgmedia\/dobbs-decision\/\"><span data-contrast=\"none\"> foi anulada h\u00e1 dois anos.<\/span><\/a>\n\n<b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Em resposta \u00e0 decis\u00e3o de hoje, <\/span><\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgleadership\/giselle-carino\/\"><b><span data-contrast=\"none\">Giselle Carino, diretora executiva da F\u00f2s Feminista<\/span><\/b><\/a><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, A empresa, que \u00e9 uma das maiores do mundo, divulgou a seguinte declara\u00e7\u00e3o:<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n<blockquote><em>\u201cPara ser claro: a decis\u00e3o de hoje n\u00e3o \u00e9 motivo de comemora\u00e7\u00e3o. Ao rejeitar este caso e n\u00e3o se pronunciar sobre os m\u00e9ritos dos argumentos, a Corte perdeu a chance de afirmar uma lei federal que protege a assist\u00eancia emergencial ao aborto.\u00a0<\/em>\n\n<em>F\u00f2s Feminista staunchly opposes any measures that undermine access to essential healthcare services, including abortion care. We advocate for policies that support comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including emergency services, and we have learned from the dire situations in countries with absolute bans that restrictions on abortion don't stop abortions from taking place; they just make them less safe. As an organization that works throughout the Global South, we see the detrimental effects of restrictive reproductive health policies all too often. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgstatements\/resolution-justiceforbeatriz\/\">em El Salvador,<\/a> mulheres foram presas por abortos espont\u00e2neos e outras complica\u00e7\u00f5es na gravidez.\u00a0<\/em>\n\n<em>Ensuring access to safe, legal abortions is crucial for protecting the health and lives of women, girls, and gender-diverse people. We stand in solidarity with our allies in the United States who advocate for ensuring this access for all who need it.\"\u00a0<\/em><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">###<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:2,&quot;335551620&quot;:2,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgabout-us\/\"><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">F\u00f2s Feminista<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> \u00e9 uma alian\u00e7a feminista internacional centrada na sa\u00fade sexual e reprodutiva, nos direitos e na justi\u00e7a para mulheres, meninas e pessoas com diversidade de g\u00eanero. Juntamente com mais de 200 organiza\u00e7\u00f5es locais em todo o mundo, n\u00f3s nos envolvemos em cuidados com a sa\u00fade, educa\u00e7\u00e3o e defesa de direitos para promover nossa agenda. Isso inclui a presta\u00e7\u00e3o de servi\u00e7os de sa\u00fade sexual e reprodutiva e a implementa\u00e7\u00e3o de estrat\u00e9gias baseadas na comunidade que tornam a sa\u00fade sexual e reprodutiva mais acess\u00edvel a mulheres, meninas e outras pessoas marginalizadas. Tamb\u00e9m envolvemos os jovens com educa\u00e7\u00e3o sexual abrangente e prestamos atendimento a sobreviventes de viol\u00eancia de g\u00eanero. Estamos ao lado de nossos parceiros nas ruas, nos tribunais e em outros espa\u00e7os de defesa como uma voz feminista sem remorso, resistindo \u00e0 injusti\u00e7a e defendendo a igualdade de g\u00eanero e os direitos reprodutivos local e globalmente.<\/span><\/i><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>","":null,"anchor_id":""}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_BR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NEW YORK, NY \u2014 The Supreme Court of the United States\u2019 decision today to dismiss the two consolidated cases centered around the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) means, for now, hospitals in Idaho must provide abortion care when it\u2019s medically necessary in an emergency situation, even in states that have abortion bans [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"F\u00f2s Feminista\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1648\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1100\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\",\"name\":\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-27T21:40:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"width\":1648,\"height\":1100},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"F\u00f2s Feminista\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","og_locale":"pt_BR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","og_description":"NEW YORK, NY \u2014 The Supreme Court of the United States\u2019 decision today to dismiss the two consolidated cases centered around the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) means, for now, hospitals in Idaho must provide abortion care when it\u2019s medically necessary in an emergency situation, even in states that have abortion bans [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","og_site_name":"F\u00f2s Feminista","article_modified_time":"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1648,"height":1100,"url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","name":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","datePublished":"2024-06-27T21:40:41+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-BR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","width":1648,"height":1100},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/","name":"F\u00f2s Feminista","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4984,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901\/revisions\/4984"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}