{"id":4901,"date":"2024-06-27T17:40:41","date_gmt":"2024-06-27T21:40:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/"},"modified":"2025-09-19T18:07:50","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T22:07:50","slug":"fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Remarques sur la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis dans les affaires relatives \u00e0 la loi sur le traitement m\u00e9dical d'urgence et le travail (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)"},"template":"","class_list":["post-4901","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","article_type-news","article_format-news","article_format-statements","issue_tax-legal-abortion","issue_legacy-abortion","location-united-states"],"acf":{"details":{"":null,"article_type":26,"article_format":44,"authors":"","add_button":false,"button_type":"link","button":"","download":"","download_button_text":"","featured_image":3288},"sidebar":{"issues":{"title":"Questions prioritaires","issues":[34]},"locations":{"title":"Localisation","locations":[147]},"partners":{"title":"Partenaires","partners":""}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_hero_article","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_hero_article":{"":null,"anchor_id":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">NEW YORK, NY <\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">- La Cour supr\u00eame des \u00c9tats-Unis\u2019 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/06\/27\/us\/politics\/supreme-court-idaho-abortion.html?\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">d\u00e9cision aujourd'hui de rejeter les deux affaires consolid\u00e9es<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> L'arr\u00eat de la Cour supr\u00eame de l'Idaho, centr\u00e9 sur la loi f\u00e9d\u00e9rale EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act), signifie que, pour l'instant, les h\u00f4pitaux de l'Idaho doivent pratiquer des avortements lorsqu'ils sont m\u00e9dicalement n\u00e9cessaires dans une situation d'urgence, m\u00eame dans les \u00c9tats qui interdisent ou restreignent l'avortement et qui ne pr\u00e9voient pas d'exception pour prot\u00e9ger la sant\u00e9 du patient. La Cour a r\u00e9tabli une d\u00e9cision d'une juridiction inf\u00e9rieure qui autorisait les services d'urgence des h\u00f4pitaux de l'Idaho \u00e0 pratiquer des avortements d'urgence pour sauver la vie et la sant\u00e9 d'une personne enceinte. L'EMTALA impose aux h\u00f4pitaux qui re\u00e7oivent des fonds f\u00e9d\u00e9raux (soit la quasi-totalit\u00e9 des h\u00f4pitaux am\u00e9ricains) de fournir les \u201ctraitements stabilisateurs n\u00e9cessaires\u201d en cas d'urgence.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">Cependant, si le fait que les patientes doivent d\u00e9sormais l\u00e9galement recevoir les soins stabilisateurs dont elles ont besoin quand elles en ont besoin dans l'Idaho est une bonne nouvelle, la Cour supr\u00eame a eu l'occasion, dans ces affaires, d'affirmer clairement les droits de toutes les femmes enceintes aux soins d'urgence, mais elle ne l'a pas fait.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">En tant que <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/23pdf\/23-726_6jgm.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Le juge Ketanji Brown Jackson a \u00e9crit,<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> la d\u00e9cision n'est pas \u201cune victoire pour les patientes enceintes de l'Idaho\u201d, mais plut\u00f4t \u201cun retard. Pendant que cette cour tergiverse et que le pays attend, les femmes enceintes qui souffrent d'une urgence m\u00e9dicale restent dans une situation pr\u00e9caire, car leurs m\u00e9decins sont tenus dans l'ignorance de ce que la loi exige\u201d.\u201d<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">L'arr\u00eat d'aujourd'hui rappelle une fois de plus l'environnement incroyablement hostile dans lequel vivent les Am\u00e9ricains en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9, de droits et de justice sexuels et reproductifs (SRHRJ) depuis le d\u00e9but de l'ann\u00e9e. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgmedia\/dobbs-decision\/\"><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">Roe v. Wade<\/span><\/i><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgmedia\/dobbs-decision\/\"><span data-contrast=\"none\"> a \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9e il y a deux ans.<\/span><\/a>\n\n<b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">En r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision d'aujourd'hui, <\/span><\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgleadership\/giselle-carino\/\"><b><span data-contrast=\"none\">Giselle Carino, directrice g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de F\u00f2s Feminista<\/span><\/b><\/a><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, a fait la d\u00e9claration suivante :<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n<blockquote><em>\u201cSoyons clairs : la d\u00e9cision d'aujourd'hui n'a rien de r\u00e9jouissant. En rejetant cette affaire et en ne statuant pas sur le bien-fond\u00e9 des arguments, la Cour a manqu\u00e9 l'occasion de confirmer une loi f\u00e9d\u00e9rale prot\u00e9geant les soins d'urgence en mati\u00e8re d'avortement.\u00a0<\/em>\n\n<em>F\u00f2s Feminista staunchly opposes any measures that undermine access to essential healthcare services, including abortion care. We advocate for policies that support comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including emergency services, and we have learned from the dire situations in countries with absolute bans that restrictions on abortion don't stop abortions from taking place; they just make them less safe. As an organization that works throughout the Global South, we see the detrimental effects of restrictive reproductive health policies all too often. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgstatements\/resolution-justiceforbeatriz\/\">au Salvador,<\/a> femmes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 emprisonn\u00e9es pour des fausses couches et d'autres complications de grossesse.\u00a0<\/em>\n\n<em>Ensuring access to safe, legal abortions is crucial for protecting the health and lives of women, girls, and gender-diverse people. We stand in solidarity with our allies in the United States who advocate for ensuring this access for all who need it.\"\u00a0<\/em><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">###<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:2,&quot;335551620&quot;:2,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgabout-us\/\"><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">F\u00f2s Feminista<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> est une alliance f\u00e9ministe internationale centr\u00e9e sur la sant\u00e9, les droits et la justice en mati\u00e8re de sexualit\u00e9 et de procr\u00e9ation pour les femmes, les jeunes filles et les personnes de sexe diff\u00e9rent. Avec plus de 200 organisations locales \u00e0 travers le monde, nous nous engageons dans les domaines de la sant\u00e9, de l'\u00e9ducation et de la d\u00e9fense des droits pour faire avancer notre programme. Il s'agit notamment de fournir des services de sant\u00e9 sexuelle et g\u00e9n\u00e9sique et de mettre en \u0153uvre des strat\u00e9gies communautaires qui rendent les soins de sant\u00e9 sexuelle et g\u00e9n\u00e9sique plus accessibles aux femmes, aux filles et aux autres personnes en marge de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9. Nous proposons \u00e9galement aux jeunes une \u00e9ducation sexuelle compl\u00e8te et prodiguons des soins aux victimes de violences sexistes. Nous nous tenons aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s de nos partenaires dans la rue, devant les tribunaux et dans d'autres espaces de plaidoyer, en tant que voix f\u00e9ministe sans \u00e9quivoque, r\u00e9sistant \u00e0 l'injustice et plaidant pour l'\u00e9galit\u00e9 des sexes et les droits g\u00e9n\u00e9siques au niveau local et mondial.<\/span><\/i><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>","":null,"anchor_id":""}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NEW YORK, NY \u2014 The Supreme Court of the United States\u2019 decision today to dismiss the two consolidated cases centered around the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) means, for now, hospitals in Idaho must provide abortion care when it\u2019s medically necessary in an emergency situation, even in states that have abortion bans [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"F\u00f2s Feminista\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1648\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1100\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\",\"name\":\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-27T21:40:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"width\":1648,\"height\":1100},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"F\u00f2s Feminista\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","og_description":"NEW YORK, NY \u2014 The Supreme Court of the United States\u2019 decision today to dismiss the two consolidated cases centered around the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) means, for now, hospitals in Idaho must provide abortion care when it\u2019s medically necessary in an emergency situation, even in states that have abortion bans [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","og_site_name":"F\u00f2s Feminista","article_modified_time":"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1648,"height":1100,"url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","name":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","datePublished":"2024-06-27T21:40:41+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","width":1648,"height":1100},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/","name":"F\u00f2s Feminista","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4984,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901\/revisions\/4984"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}