{"id":4901,"date":"2024-06-27T17:40:41","date_gmt":"2024-06-27T21:40:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/"},"modified":"2025-09-19T18:07:50","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T22:07:50","slug":"fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Observaciones sobre la decisi\u00f3n del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en los casos relacionados con la Ley de Tratamiento M\u00e9dico de Emergencia y Trabajo (Moyle contra Estados Unidos, Idaho contra Estados Unidos)"},"template":"","class_list":["post-4901","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","article_type-news","article_format-news","article_format-statements","issue_tax-legal-abortion","issue_legacy-abortion","location-united-states"],"acf":{"details":{"":null,"article_type":26,"article_format":44,"authors":"","add_button":false,"button_type":"link","button":"","download":"","download_button_text":"","featured_image":3288},"sidebar":{"issues":{"title":"Cuestiones prioritarias","issues":[34]},"locations":{"title":"Ubicaci\u00f3n","locations":[147]},"partners":{"title":"Socios","partners":""}},"page_layout":[{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_hero_article","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_hero_article":{"":null,"anchor_id":""}},{"acf_fc_layout":"layout_wysiwyg","_acfe_flexible_toggle":null,"component_wysiwyg":{"content":"<b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">NUEVA YORK, NY <\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u2014 La Suprema Corte de Justicia de los Estados Unidos\u2019 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/06\/27\/us\/politics\/supreme-court-idaho-abortion.html?\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">decisi\u00f3n de hoy de desestimar los dos casos consolidados<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> centrada en la Ley Federal de Tratamiento M\u00e9dico de Emergencia y Trabajo de Parto (EMTALA) significa, por ahora, que los hospitales de Idaho deben proporcionar atenci\u00f3n abortiva cuando sea m\u00e9dicamente necesario en una situaci\u00f3n de emergencia, incluso en estados que tienen prohibiciones o restricciones al aborto que no prev\u00e9n excepciones para proteger la salud de la paciente. El Tribunal restableci\u00f3 una sentencia de un tribunal inferior que permit\u00eda a las salas de urgencias de los hospitales de Idaho realizar abortos de emergencia para salvar la vida y la salud de una persona embarazada. La EMTALA exige a los hospitales que reciben fondos federales (que son casi todos los hospitales de EE. UU.) que proporcionen el \u201ctratamiento estabilizador necesario\u201d en caso de emergencia.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">Sin embargo, aunque es una buena noticia que ahora los pacientes est\u00e9n legalmente obligados a recibir la atenci\u00f3n estabilizadora que necesitan cuando la necesitan en Idaho, con estos casos el Tribunal Supremo tuvo la oportunidad de afirmar claramente los derechos de todas las personas embarazadas a recibir atenci\u00f3n de emergencia, pero no lo hizo.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">Como <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/23pdf\/23-726_6jgm.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">La jueza Ketanji Brown Jackson escribi\u00f3:,<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> La decisi\u00f3n \u201cno es una victoria para las pacientes embarazadas de Idaho\u201d, sino \u201cun retraso\u201d. Mientras este tribunal se demora y el pa\u00eds espera, las personas embarazadas que sufren emergencias m\u00e9dicas siguen en una situaci\u00f3n precaria, ya que sus m\u00e9dicos desconocen lo que exige la ley.\u201d<\/span>\n\n<span data-contrast=\"auto\">La sentencia de hoy es otro recordatorio del entorno incre\u00edblemente hostil en materia de salud, derechos y justicia sexuales y reproductivos (SRHRJ) en el que han vivido los estadounidenses desde <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgmedia\/dobbs-decision\/\"><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">Roe contra Wade<\/span><\/i><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgmedia\/dobbs-decision\/\"><span data-contrast=\"none\"> fue revocada hace dos a\u00f1os.<\/span><\/a>\n\n<b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">En respuesta a la decisi\u00f3n de hoy, <\/span><\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgleadership\/giselle-carino\/\"><b><span data-contrast=\"none\">Giselle Carino, directora ejecutiva de F\u00f2s Feminista<\/span><\/b><\/a><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, emiti\u00f3 la siguiente declaraci\u00f3n:<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n<blockquote><em>\u201cPara ser claros: la decisi\u00f3n de hoy no es motivo de celebraci\u00f3n. Al desestimar este caso y no pronunciarse sobre el fondo de los argumentos, el Tribunal ha perdido la oportunidad de reafirmar una ley federal que protege la atenci\u00f3n m\u00e9dica de emergencia en casos de aborto.\u00a0<\/em>\n\n<em>F\u00f2s Feminista staunchly opposes any measures that undermine access to essential healthcare services, including abortion care. We advocate for policies that support comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including emergency services, and we have learned from the dire situations in countries with absolute bans that restrictions on abortion don't stop abortions from taking place; they just make them less safe. As an organization that works throughout the Global South, we see the detrimental effects of restrictive reproductive health policies all too often. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgstatements\/resolution-justiceforbeatriz\/\">en El Salvador,<\/a> Las mujeres han sido encarceladas por abortos espont\u00e1neos y otras complicaciones del embarazo.\u00a0<\/em>\n\n<em>Ensuring access to safe, legal abortions is crucial for protecting the health and lives of women, girls, and gender-diverse people. We stand in solidarity with our allies in the United States who advocate for ensuring this access for all who need it.\"\u00a0<\/em><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">###<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:2,&quot;335551620&quot;:2,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>\n\n<a href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.orgabout-us\/\"><i><span data-contrast=\"none\">F\u00f2s Feminista<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\"> es una alianza feminista internacional centrada en la salud, los derechos y la justicia sexuales y reproductivos de las mujeres, las ni\u00f1as y las personas de g\u00e9nero diverso. Junto con m\u00e1s de 200 organizaciones locales de todo el mundo, nos dedicamos a la atenci\u00f3n m\u00e9dica, la educaci\u00f3n y la defensa de nuestros objetivos. Esto incluye la prestaci\u00f3n de servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva y la aplicaci\u00f3n de estrategias comunitarias que faciliten el acceso a la atenci\u00f3n m\u00e9dica sexual y reproductiva a las mujeres, las ni\u00f1as y otras personas marginadas. Tambi\u00e9n involucramos a los j\u00f3venes con una educaci\u00f3n sexual integral y brindamos atenci\u00f3n a las sobrevivientes de la violencia de g\u00e9nero. Nos unimos a nuestros socios en las calles, en los tribunales y en otros espacios de defensa como una voz feminista sin complejos, resistiendo la injusticia y defendiendo la igualdad de g\u00e9nero y los derechos reproductivos a nivel local y mundial.<\/span><\/i><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">\u00a0<\/span>","":null,"anchor_id":""}}]},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NEW YORK, NY \u2014 The Supreme Court of the United States\u2019 decision today to dismiss the two consolidated cases centered around the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) means, for now, hospitals in Idaho must provide abortion care when it\u2019s medically necessary in an emergency situation, even in states that have abortion bans [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"F\u00f2s Feminista\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1648\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1100\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\",\"name\":\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-06-27T21:40:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png\",\"width\":1648,\"height\":1100},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/news-and-stories\\\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"F\u00f2s Feminista\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/fosfeminista.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","og_description":"NEW YORK, NY \u2014 The Supreme Court of the United States\u2019 decision today to dismiss the two consolidated cases centered around the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) means, for now, hospitals in Idaho must provide abortion care when it\u2019s medically necessary in an emergency situation, even in states that have abortion bans [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","og_site_name":"F\u00f2s Feminista","article_modified_time":"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1648,"height":1100,"url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/","name":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States) - F\u00f2s Feminista","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","datePublished":"2024-06-27T21:40:41+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-19T22:07:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Speaking-Truth-to-Power-1.png","width":1648,"height":1100},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/news-and-stories\/fos-feminista-remarks-on-u-s-supreme-court-decision-in-emergency-medical-treatment-and-labor-act-cases-moyle-v-united-states-idaho-v-united-states\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Remarks on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act cases (Moyle v. United States, Idaho v. United States)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/","name":"F\u00f2s Feminista","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4984,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/4901\/revisions\/4984"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fosfeminista.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}